By continuing you agree to our use of cookies. You are able to update your settings at any time.

Cookie Policy

A cookie, also known as an HTTP cookie, web cookie, or browser cookie, is a piece of data stored by a website within a browser, and then subsequently sent back to the same website by the browser. Cookies were designed to be a reliable mechanism for websites to remember things that a browser had done there in the past, which can include having clicked particular buttons, logging in, or having read pages on that site months or years ago.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies cannot be disabled

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off. They are normally set in response to your interactions on the website e.g. logging in etc.

Cookies:
  • .ASPXANONYMOUS
  • .DOTNETNUKE
  • __RequestVerificationToken
  • authentication
  • CV_Portal
  • CV_Store_Portal_Cart_21
  • CV_USER
  • dnn_IsMobile
  • language
  • LastPageId
  • NADevGDPRCookieConsent_portal_21
  • userBrowsingCookie

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to monitor traffic to our website so we can improve the performance and content of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited or how you navigated around our website.

Cookies:
  • _ga
  • _gat
  • _gid

Functional Cookies

These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and content. They may be set by the website or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then some or all of these services may not function properly.

Cookies:

Currently we are not utilizing these types of cookies on our site.

Targeting Cookies

These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

Cookies:

Currently we are not utilizing these types of cookies on our site.

HomeHomeDiscussionsDiscussionsGeneralGeneralOsprey Vs. Hill People Gear packsOsprey Vs. Hill People Gear packs
Previous
 
Next
New Post
11/28/2019 10:58 AM
 

It's time for me to upgrade my pack. I've narrowed it down to a couple packs but i'm open for other suggestions. I like the fit of the Osprey Aether 70 but I tend to abuse my packs so id considered something like the HPG Ute possibly with a kitbag, but have never seen one in the wild. I would prefer to have more organization and utility in my pack than just a main compartment and belt pocket.

I need it for 1-5 day solo hikes and SAR, so my carry needs vary from 30L to 70L. Most of my equipment is lightweight and getting lighter and carrying less as time goes on.

The price tag on the HPG is a bit higher but is it more durable and worth it? Anybody have experience with these or have any other suggestions?

 
New Post
11/28/2019 2:48 PM
 
If durability is one of your concerns (and from my reading of your post, it is), then I would look to the HPG. No question.
 
New Post
11/29/2019 7:57 PM
 

Looking at one review. Gent mentioned that over 60-70 lbs is a little awkward. I can personally attest to a load in the 80's (Ute w/prairie belt) was fully contained and not awkward sliding down a mountainside. Had full control of the pack but the legs felt the weight and weren't use to it. Looking at the belt on the Aether70-very skinny compared to a Prairie Belt. The prairie belt happens to be the most comfortable belt I have ever worn. Even my old gregory wasn't as comfortable with a load. I often have pinched hips in other belts when taken out to the backcountry. As far as organization, a few bags selectively placed will help. There is a lid pocket as well and the kit bag can be strapped to the top.

 
New Post
11/30/2019 7:33 AM
 

I ran an Aether 70 our last couple years of backpacking before we had a baby. I put several hundred miles on it, and frankly I feel like the amount of wear it stacked up during that time is out of proportion to the mileage.

It's got some abraded nylon and a delta strap that is halfway broken. One of these days I'll get around to sending the hip belt back to Osprey, but in the meantime I've just been running a HPG belt.

I also prefer the Umlindi/Ute/Qui-Ya "one big sack storage system. I keep all my stuff organized with dry-bags so that works for me.

We're back to doing low mileage, two and three day trips, so I'm still using the Aether 70, but either in 2020 or 2021, I'll buy either a Ute or a Qui-Ya.

 
New Post
6/29/2020 4:29 AM
 

Most of my equipment is lightweight and getting lighter and carrying less as time goes on. even i am searching for the same solution https://telechargerscratch.fr/telecha...ratuit-francais

 
New Post
9/23/2020 12:03 PM
 
I also prefer the Umlindi/Ute/Qui-Ya "one big sack storage system. I keep all my stuff organized with dry-bags so that works for me.

 
New Post
10/29/2020 5:52 PM
 
there is one thing the Ute doesn't have that i like from other brands and that is the mesh back pocket for storing wet items externally, It would be nice if they would design something to attach, As there equipment is superior in all other categories.
 
New Post
11/1/2020 6:25 PM
 

Trapper, Seek Outside makes a trim lightweight mesh pocket/panel you can easily add to an HPG pack. It is available in orange as well.  I prefer that mesh panel setup myself.  I used a ULA Catalyst for years before my daughter stole it.

 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeDiscussionsDiscussionsGeneralGeneralOsprey Vs. Hill People Gear packsOsprey Vs. Hill People Gear packs